Cost of living comparison

Cost of Living: Chicago, IL vs Indianapolis, IN

Indianapolis is about 8% cheaper than Chicago overall.

Comparing Chicago, IL and Indianapolis, IN across cost of living, rent, income, and the salary needed to live comfortably. Indianapolis has a lower overall price level, driven mainly by housing.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Metric Chicago Indianapolis
Cost of living index103.695.7
Median rent$1,380$1,112
Rent, 1-bedroom (FMR)$1,581$1,267
Rent, 2-bedroom (FMR)$1,781$1,473
Median home value$315,200$207,000
Median household income$75,134$62,995
Salary needed (single)$63,200$50,700
Salary needed (family)$91,800$76,300

Green highlights the more favorable value for each metric. Lower is better for costs; higher is better for income. Figures are estimates from public data (BEA, Census, HUD).

Which City Is More Affordable?

Overall, Indianapolis is the more affordable of the two, with a cost-of-living index of 95.7 versus 103.6 for Chicago. The biggest difference is usually housing, where rents in Chicago run noticeably higher.

You can read the full breakdown for each city on its own page: cost of living in Chicago and cost of living in Indianapolis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it cheaper to live in Chicago or Indianapolis?

Indianapolis is about 8% cheaper than Chicago overall, based on the BEA cost-of-living index (Indianapolis: 95.7 vs Chicago: 103.6).

What is the rent difference between Chicago and Indianapolis?

The median rent is $1,380 in Chicago and $1,112 in Indianapolis.

How much salary do you need in Chicago vs Indianapolis?

A single person needs about $63,200 in Chicago and $50,700 in Indianapolis to live comfortably.

Data Sources

Cost-of-living index from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (Regional Price Parities). Income, rent, and home value from the U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey 5-Year). Fair Market Rents from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.